4.8 Article

Checkpoint-mediated DNA polymerase ε exonuclease activity curbing counteracts resection- driven fork collapse

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 81, Issue 13, Pages 2778-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [BFU2014-52529-R, BFU2017-87013-R]
  2. Junta de Castilla y Leon [SA042P17, SA103P20]
  3. Spanish Formacion del Personal Investigador (FPI) program
  4. Spanish Juan de la Cierva-Formacion program
  5. BBVA Foundation
  6. National Institute of Health - NIGMS [R35GM141159]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA polymerase e (Pole) plays a key role in nascent strand resection, which can be prevented and stalled replication forks stabilized through checkpoint kinase regulation.
DNA polymerase e (Pole) carries out high-fidelity leading strand synthesis owing to its exonuclease activity. Pole polymerase and exonuclease activities are balanced, because of partitioning of nascent DNA strands between catalytic sites, so that net resection occurs when synthesis is impaired. In vivo, DNA synthesis stalling activates replication checkpoint kinases, which act to preserve the functional integrity of replication forks. We show that stalled Pole drives nascent strand resection causing fork functional collapse, averted via checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation. Pole catalytic subunit Pol2 is phosphorylated on serine 430, influencing partitioning between polymerase and exonuclease active sites. A phosphormimetic S430D change reduces exonucleolysis in vitro and counteracts fork collapse. Conversely, non-phosphorylatable pol2-S430A expression causes resection-driven stressed fork defects. Our findings reveal that checkpoint kinases switch Pole to an exonuclease-safe mode preventing nascent strand resection and stabilizing stalled replication forks. Elective partitioning suppression has implications for the diverse Pole roles in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available