4.4 Review

Novel Strategies to Combat Bacterial Biofilms

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 7, Pages 569-586

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-021-00325-8

Keywords

Biofilm; Antibiofilm agents; Biofilm-related infections; Therapeutic approaches

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biofilms are a severe problem in bacterial infection treatment, with new therapeutic approaches needed to address biofilm-related infections. Potential strategies to inhibit bacterial biofilm development include the use of antiadhesion agents, AMPs, and other methods to interfere with different phases of biofilm development.
Biofilms are considered as a severe problem in the treatment of bacterial infections; their development causes some noticeable resistance to antibacterial agents. Biofilms are responsible for at least two-thirds of all infections, displaying promoted resistance to classical antibiotic treatments. Therefore, finding new alternative therapeutic approaches is essential for the treatment and inhibition of biofilm-related infections. Therefore, this review aims to describe the potential therapeutic strategies that can inhibit bacterial biofilm development; these include the usage of antiadhesion agents, AMPs, bacteriophages, QSIs, aptamers, NPs and PNAs, which can prevent or eradicate the formation of biofilms. These antibiofilm agents represent a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of biofilm infections and development of a strong capability to interfere with different phases of the biofilm development, including adherence, polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA), quorum sensing molecules and cell-to-cell connection, bacterial aggregation, planktonic bacteria killing and host-immune response modulation. In addition, these components, in combination with antibiotics, can lead to the development of some kind of powerful combined therapy against bacterial biofilm-related infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available