4.4 Review

How to bring peer review ghostwriters out of the dark

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 461-466

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E20-10-0642

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Open Philanthropy Project through Future of Research-General Support

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early career researchers play a significant role in peer review, and systemic changes to acknowledge this fact can lead to ethical co-reviewing, higher quality peer reviews, and a reduction in the burden for peer reviewers.
Early career researchers are frequent and valuable contributors to peer review. Systemic changes that acknowledge this fact would result in ethical co-reviewing, peer reviews of greater quality, and a reduction in peer reviewer burden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available