4.5 Article

Structural adaption of the nasal conchae of Eurasian common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus chloropus, Linnaeus, 1758)-Histomorphological study

Journal

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
Volume 84, Issue 9, Pages 2195-2202

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23778

Keywords

Eurasian common moorhen; gross morphology; histology and nasal conchae

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anatomical and histological examination of the nasal conchae of the Eurasian common moorhen revealed structural and histological differences among the rostral, middle, and caudal conchae. The nasal conchae function in conditioning inspired air and entrapping antigens.
In the current study, the nasal conchae of the Eurasian common moorhen were grossly and histologically examined for 20 healthy adult birds. Rostral (RC), middle (MC), and caudal (CC) conchae in each side of the nasal cavity were observed. The anatomical cross sections revealed that, the RC was noncurved in its rostral and middle parts, and one half turn in its caudal part. The MC was one half turn in its rostral part, one turn in its middle part, and one and one half turns in its caudal part. The CC was like a pouch from the lateral wall of the nasal cavity. Histologically, the distribution of the mucous glands was different among the three conchae; In RC, the ducts of these glands were intraepithelial, while the acini were located in the propria-submucosa toward the convex surface of the concha and absent toward its concave surface. In MC, they were intraepithelial and opened directly on the surface epithelium of the convex and concave surfaces. In CC, they were intraepithelial in few number near the convex surface of the concha and with abundant number in the propria-submucosa and absent near the concave surface. The RC was richer in the vascularity than the other two conchae. The nasal conchae were functioning for conditioning of the inspired air and entrapping the antigens presented in it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available