4.7 Article

Non-invasive identification of commercial green tea blends using NIR spectroscopy and support vector machine

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106052

Keywords

Machine learning; Handheld spectrometer; Discriminant analysis; Tea analysis; Process analytical technology

Funding

  1. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Bioanalitica -INCTBio [FAPESP] [2014/508673]
  2. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Bioanalitica -INCTBio [CNPq] [465389/2014]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq [303994/2017-7]
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -CAPES [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to differentiate four commercial blends of green tea using NIR spectroscopy and SVM, with Bayesian optimization providing accurate models. The results indicated that the proposed methodology has the potential to be applied in automatic quality control.
In this study, we aimed to discriminate four commercial blends of green tea in bagged (inside its sachet) and nonbagged conditions using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and support vector machines (SVM) for data modelling. To choose optimal parameters for the models, we applied Bayesian optimization, which provided accurate models. Two spectrometers were evaluated: a benchtop and a handheld, both presenting reliable results for nonbagged tea (accuracies of 90% and 93%, respectively). However, for bagged tea models, the classification performance of benchtop was superior to handheld equipment, yielding accuracies of 93% and 82%, respectively. Classification accuracies using SVM outperformed partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS?DA) for handheld and tea inside teabag models. The results indicated that the proposed methodology has the potential to be applied in automatic quality control coupling NIR sensors and machine learning for data processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available