4.5 Review

Is preemptive analgesia a good choice for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025319

Keywords

analgesia; lumbar spine surgery; morphine consumption; preemptive; visual analog scale

Funding

  1. Xiaoshan District Major Science and Technology Program [2019223]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preemptive analgesia has been shown to be safe and effective for reducing postoperative pain, lowering morphine consumption, shortening hospital stay without increasing complications in lumbar spine surgery based on the results of this study.
Background: Lumbar spine surgery is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Adequate pain management during the postoperative period facilitates rehabilitation. Recently, preemptive analgesia has been considered among the important analgesic methods for reducing postoperative pain. However, its efficacy in postoperative pain relief after lumbar spine surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of preemptive analgesia on lumbar spine surgery. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials in PubMed (1996 to May 2020), Embase (1980 to May 2020), and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, May 2020). We included seven studies that evaluated the preemptive analgesic efficacy in lumbar spine surgeries. Results: Seven studies, including 509 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Pooled data revealed that preemptive analgesia is effective for lumbar spine surgeries with respect to the visual analog scale score (P < .05), total morphine equivalent consumption (P < .05), and length of stay (P < .05), without increasing complications (P = .73). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that preemptive analgesia is safe and effective for lumbar spine surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available