4.7 Article

Experimental characterization and evaluation of magnetorheological clutch for an electric two-wheeler application

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109150

Keywords

Magnetorheological fluid (MRF); Magnetorheological clutch (MRC); Electric vehicle; Correlation analysis, Uncertainty analysis

Funding

  1. Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Rajaramnagar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores a prototype of a magnetorheological clutch for a two-wheeled electric vehicle, which provides quick response, accurate torque transmission control, and an electro-mechanical interface. The research evaluates the torque transmission capability of MRC with and without slits in terms of input parameters analytically and experimentally, confirming the increase in torque transmission and thermal behavior due to the presence of slits. However, the weight and size of the MRC remain a major challenge for its successful integration with a two-wheeled electric vehicle application.
This work makes an effort to explore a magnetorheological clutch (MRC) prototype for a two-wheeled electric vehicle owing to its quick response, accurate torque transmission control by varying the magnetic field; and electro-mechanical interface. A design variation 'MRC with-slits' is proposed to enhance the torque transmission capacity and compared with `MRC without-slits'. The torque transmitting capability of the MRC with and without-slits is evaluated analytically and experimentally with respect to input parameters viz. current and speeds. The rise in torque transmission due to the presence of slits and thermal behavior is validated experimentally. Correlation and uncertainty analysis are used to confirm the findings. The weight and size of the MRC remains a major challenge for its successful integration with a two-wheeled electric vehicle application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available