Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Proteins, peptides and peptidomimetics as active agents in implant surface functionalization
Przemyslaw Jurczak et al.
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE (2020)
Review: the potential impact of surface crystalline states of titanium for biomedical applications
Julien Barthes et al.
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY (2018)
Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness
Oleh Andrukhov et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS (2016)
Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in the absence of osteogenic supplements: A surface-roughness gradient study
Ana B. Faia-Torres et al.
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA (2015)
Implants in bone: Part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives
Cornelius von wilmowsky et al.
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG (2014)
A Comparison of Epithelial Cells, Fibroblasts, and Osteoblasts in Dental Implant Titanium Topographies
Fu-Yuan Teng et al.
BIOINORGANIC CHEMISTRY AND APPLICATIONS (2012)
Morphological evaluation of chondrogenic potency in passaged cell populations
Masahiro Kino-oka et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING (2009)
CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes
Anne E. Carpenter et al.
GENOME BIOLOGY (2006)
Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity
S Lossdörfer et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A (2004)
The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor Osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation
K Nakashima et al.
CELL (2002)
Share Paper
