4.7 Article

The effects of microstructures and radiation damage on the deformation behavior of a HT-9 alloy using microtensile testing

Journal

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110972

Keywords

Microtensile testing; Tempered-martensitic; Interface failure; Radiation damage

Funding

  1. DOE-NEUP program [DENE 00008767]
  2. Department of National Nuclear Security Administration through the Nuclear Science and Security Consortium [DE-NA0003180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized in situ SEM microtensile testing to investigate the deformation behavior of specific martensitic boundaries in 1 dpa proton-irradiated HT-9, revealing that high angle martensitic boundaries are more susceptible to radiation-induced failure compared to low angle martensitic boundaries.
Understanding the influence of radiation damage on the mechanical properties of HT-9 and other tempered martensitic alloys is part of the mission in developing radiation-tolerant materials for the next generation of nuclear reactors. Although there has been extensive data on the macroscopic mechanical properties of the irradiated HT-9 alloys and microstructural changes, it is not well-understood how radiation damage and the resulting microstructural changes influence the local mechanical properties. In this study, we utilized in situ SEM microtensile testing to investigate the deformation behavior of specific martensitic boundaries in 1 dpa protonirradiated HT-9 and answered the question of what is the weakest link. We provided the direct observation of the failure modes of microtensiles containing high angle and low angle martensitic boundaries. In the unirradiated condition, the deformation is ductile and no martensitic boundary failure is observed. In the irradiated condition, the high angle martensitic boundaries are more susceptible to radiation-induced boundary failure as compared to the low angle martensitic boundaries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available