4.6 Article

A comparative study on shrinkage characteristics of graphene oxide (GO) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) modified alkali-activated slag cement composites

Journal

MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-021-01695-w

Keywords

Alkali-activated slag cement (AAS); Graphene oxide (GO); Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs); Drying shrinkage ~ Autogenous shrinkage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878102, 51778089]
  2. Shenzhen University
  3. SRTP (Student Research Training Programme) of Chongqing University [CQU-SRTP-2014175]
  4. Analytical and Testing Centre of Chongqing University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the use of GO/GNPs further increases the shrinkage of AAS due to the refined microstructure and higher hydration degree of GGBS. Therefore, these two nano materials cannot mitigate the main drawback of AAS, which is high shrinkage.
Use of graphene oxide (GO) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) has shown some promising potential to boost the performance of Portland cement (PC). Their influence and working mechanisms in other binding systems, e.g. alkali-activated slag (AAS), are still unclear, although some encouraging results have been reported. This study aims at characterising and quantifying roles of GO and GNPs on shrinkage of AAS mortars. A comprehensive experimental programme was carried out to assess the drying shrinkage and autogenous shrinkage of GO/ GNPs-added AAS cements along with hydration process and microstructural changes in order to explain the reasons. The results indicate that the shrinkage of AAS is further increased by GO/GNPs due to refined microstructure and higher degree of hydration of GGBS. That is, the main drawback of AAS, high shrinkage, cannot be mitigated by using these two nano materials. Against these backgrounds,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available