4.7 Article

Drivers of coral bleaching in a Marine Protected Area of the Southern Gulf of Mexico during the 2015 event

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112256

Keywords

Coral bleaching; Alacranes Reef; Marine Protected Area; Depth refugia; Heat stress metrics

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia de Mexico (CONACyT) [340074]
  2. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT) [PROCER/PNAA/02/2015]
  3. CINVESTAV-IPN [FOMIX-YUC-2014-C17246841]
  4. CONANP
  5. SEMAR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research findings indicate that depth is the most relevant variable related to coral bleaching and severity, with deeper reefs being most affected; in addition, coral reefs with higher structural complexity are also among the most affected. Accumulated heat stress and thermal variation were identified as important drivers of coral bleaching.
Here we report the bleached coral cover and its drivers observed at Alacranes Reef in 2015. Our results show that 2015 was an unprecedented heat stress event. However, we observed low coral bleaching, with the most substantial impact on sites with a 10?20% of coral cover with bleaching. Depth was the most relevant variable related to coral bleaching and the bleaching severity index, with deeper reefs being most affected. Further, our results show that reefs with higher structural complexity based on species composition were among the most affected. We identified that accumulated heat stress and thermal variation in the last 28 days were relevant drivers of coral bleaching. This work highlights the importance of multidimensional frameworks in assessing the spatial variation of coral bleaching, demonstrating the importance of structural habitat variables such as depth in high heat stress events and at a reef scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available