4.7 Article

Availability and assessment of microplastic ingestion by marsh birds in Mississippi Gulf Coast tidal marshes

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112187

Keywords

Clapper Rail; Estuarine; Microfiber; Pollution; Seaside Sparrow; Stomach flushing

Funding

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Hatch project
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA17NOS4200045, NA18NOS4200063]
  3. Mississippi Department of Marine Resources [8200025414]
  4. Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality -Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund [335414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides the first evidence of microplastic ingestion by marsh birds and its distribution in coastal marshes within Mississippi. Microplastics were detected in 64% of marsh sediment samples, 83% of Clapper Rail samples, and 69% of Seaside Sparrow samples, with fibers being the dominant type.
Millions of tons of plastic enter the environment every year, where much of it concentrates in environmental sinks such as tidal marshes. With prior studies documenting harm to marine fauna caused by this plastic pollution, the need to understand how this novel type of pollution affects estuarine fauna is great. Yet, research on the fate and uptake of plastic pollutants in estuarine ecosystems is sparse. Therefore, we quantified plastic prevalence and ingestion by two species of resident marsh bird, Clapper Rails (Rallus crepitans) and Seaside Sparrows (Ammospiza maritima), in coastal marsh ecosystems within Mississippi. We detected microplastics (plastics smaller than 5 mm) in 64% of marsh sediment samples, 83% of Clapper Rail and 69% of Seaside Sparrow proventriculus samples. Dominant types of microplastics detected in sediment and bird samples were fibers. This study provides the first evidence of microplastic ingestion by marsh birds and its distribution in coastal marshes within Mississippi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available