4.3 Article

Computational fluid dynamics of flow regime and hydrodynamic forces generated by a gliding North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis)

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 826-842

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12798

Keywords

boundary layer; CFD; drag; Eubalaena glacialis; hydrodynamics; right whale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted computational fluid dynamics analysis on right whales to measure drag and found several characteristics of their drag forces. At a swimming speed of 2 m/s, analyses were conducted on boundary layer thicknesses, flow regimes, and drag components at different areas of the whale's body. The study revealed specific findings on the drag coefficient of right whales at different swimming speeds.
Accurate estimates of drag on marine animals are required to investigate the locomotive cost, propulsive efficiency, and the impacts of entanglement if the animal is carrying fishing gear. In this study, we performed computational fluid dynamics analysis of a 10 m (length over all) right whale to obtain baseline measurements of drag on the animal. Swimming speeds covering known right whale speed range (0.125 m/s to 8 m/s) were tested. We found a weak dependence between drag coefficient and Reynolds number. At a swimming speed of 2 m/s, we analyzed the boundary layer thicknesses, the flow regimes, and drag components. We found the thickest boundary layer at the lateral sides of the peduncle, whereas the boundary layer thickness over the outer part of the flukes was less than 1.7 cm. Laminar flow occurred over the anterior similar to 0.6 LoA and turbulent flow from similar to 0.8 LoA to the fluke notch. On the surfaces of the flukes outside of the body wake region, flow was laminar. Our most significant finding is that the drag coefficient (0.0071-0.0059) of a right whale for swimming speeds ranging from 0.25 m/s to 2 m/s is approximately twice that of many previous estimates for cetaceans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available