4.4 Article

Are cleaner fish clean?

Journal

MARINE BIOLOGY
Volume 168, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-021-03858-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. James Cook University Postgraduate Research Scholarship (JCUPRS)
  2. University of Queensland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cleaner wrasse in the Indo-Pacific region are infected by a variety of parasites, including species that are rarely found in other fish. This suggests that some parasite species may exploit cleaning symbiosis to complete their life cycles.
Cleaner fish remove parasites from other organisms, called clients. While there is an extensive body of work on the positive role of cleaners for their clients and reef communities, remarkably, potential parasites hosted by specialised cleaner fishes themselves have not been explored. In this study, we surveyed the parasite community of the Indo-Pacific cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus, and compared it to other wrasses from the same region. L. dimidiatus was found to be infected by eight parasite groups including ectoparasites (copepods, isopods, trichodinids, monogeneans and turbellarians) and endoparasites (myxozoans, trematodes and cestodes) representing at least 12 species. The abundance and prevalence of most parasite groups was comparable to other wrasses, with the exception of bucephalid trematodes, which are not known to infect any other tropical wrasses except for Labroides species. This adds to mounting evidence that some parasite species exhibit atypical life cycles that exploit cleaning symbiosis. Particularly noteworthy was the discovery of gnathiid isopods on L. dimidiatus, which are generally considered the cleaner's primary food item. Our findings provide new evidence for a potential role of wild cleaner fish as vectors of parasites to new clients, which highlights potential costs associated with cleaning symbiosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available