4.7 Article

Analogue based drug design, synthesis, molecular docking and anticancer evaluation of novel chromene sulfonamide hybrids as aromatase inhibitors and apoptosis enhancers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 946-958

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.020

Keywords

Sulfonamides; Chromene; Aromatase inhibitors; Apoptosis; Breast cancer

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University through Research Group Project [RGP-302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty novel chromene derivatives carrying different sulfonamide moieties (3-22) were designed and synthesized. All the newly prepared compounds were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against breast cancer cell line (T47D). Most of the synthesized compounds showed good to moderate activity (IC50 = 8.8-108.9 mu M), where compound 16 (IC50 = 8.8 mu M) exhibited higher activity compared to doxorubicin (IC50 = 9.8 mu M). In order to determine the mechanism of the anticancer activity in T47D cells, the effect of the most potent compounds (5-8, 11-14, and 16-18) on the aromatase activity was tested. Most of the selected compounds showed significant inhibitory effect on the aromatase activity, with compound 18 showing IC50 = 4.66 mu M. Furthermore, apoptosis studies were conducted on two of the most potent compounds (8 & 16) to estimate the proapoptotic potential of our compounds. Both induced the levels of active caspase 3, caspase 8 and caspase 9. Moreover, they surprisingly boosted the Bax/Bc12 ratio 5936 & 33,000 folds, respectively compared to the control. Moreover, they showed mild cytotoxic effect (IC50 = 183.8 mu M & 172.04 mu M, respectively) in normal breast cells 184A1. Finally, a molecular docking study was performed to investigate the probable interaction with the aromatase enzyme. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available