4.3 Article

Systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adults: A retrospective study in Brazilian patients

Journal

LUPUS
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1197-1202

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09612033211010330

Keywords

Systemic lupus erythematosus; childhood; adulthood; glomerulonephritis; central nervous system involvement

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that pediatric onset SLE patients had a higher frequency of severe manifestations such as glomerulonephritis and central nervous system involvement compared to adult onset patients. However, differences in glomerulonephritis occurrence disappeared when only male patients were compared.
Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have a different serological and clinical profile according to age of disease onset. Aim To compare clinical presentation and serological data from patients with SLE onset in childhood (cSLE) with disease onset in adulthood (aSLE) in a sample of Brazilian patients. Methods Retrospective study of 614 SLE patients from a single Rheumatology Unit from Brazil: 77 (12.5%) cSLE and 537 (87.4%) aSLE. Clinical and serological data were obtained from the charts. Comparisons of cSLE with aSLE in general and according to patient's gender were made. Results The comparison of whole sample showed that children had more malar rash (p = 0.04), seizures (p < 0.0001), psychosis (p = 0.02), glomerulonephritis (p = 0.001), anti-dsDNA (p = 0.008), anticardiolipin IgM (p = 0.04) but less discoid lesions (p = 0.01), anti-Ro (p < 0.0001) and anti-La antibodies (p = 0.007). When only the male sample was compared, no differences in glomerulonephritis and anti-dsDNA frequencies were found. Conclusion Children had a higher frequency of severe manifestations (glomerulonephritis and central nervous system) than adults. The difference in glomerulonephritis occurrence disappeared when only males were compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available