4.3 Article

Real-world evidence on survival, adverse events, and health care burden in Medicare patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 1325-1334

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1919662

Keywords

Mantle cell lymphoma; MCL; economic burden; costs; treatment patterns; adverse events

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This population-based study of mantle cell lymphoma patients in the United States Medicare system found that BR was the preferred first-line treatment with higher overall survival compared to other regimens, with ibrutinib having lower survival rates. Patients with more adverse events experienced significantly higher monthly costs, indicating a greater economic burden.
Most data on overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are from controlled trials; therefore, in this population-based study, we retrospectively assessed treatment patterns, OS, and AEs in MCL patients initiating systemic treatment during 2013-2015 using the United States Medicare claims database. Among 1390 eligible patients (median age = 74 years), chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine/rituximab (BR) was the preferred choice in first-line (35.3%), followed by ibrutinib (33.5%), rituximab (9.1%), and rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (R-CHOP) (6.8%). Twenty-four-month OS was 73% for BR; 47%, ibrutinib; 72%, rituximab; and 71%, R-CHOP. For the four most commonly used regimens, neutropenia, anemia, hypertension, and infection were the most frequent AEs. Patients with >= 3 AEs had nearly four times higher monthly costs than those with 0-2 AEs in the first observed therapy line. Findings demonstrate a substantial increase in the economic burden as the number of AEs increased among the Medicare MCL patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available