4.7 Article

Determinants of CD19-positive vs CD19-negative relapse after tisagenlecleucel for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 35, Issue 12, Pages 3383-3393

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01281-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tisagenlecleucel therapy has shown promising efficacy in relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL patients, with a high complete remission rate at D28. However, factors such as prior therapy and disease burden can impact the risk of relapse and overall survival. Detectable MRD at D28 and loss of BCA may define patients at high risk of relapse, requiring additional interventions.
Tisagenlecleucel therapy has shown promising efficacy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, relapses occur in 30-50% of patients. Determinants for CD19(pos) versus CD19(neg) relapses are poorly characterized. We report on 51 patients with R/R BCP-ALL (median age 17 years) infused with tisagenlecleucel after lymphodepletion. Complete remission rate at D28 was 96%. Prior blinatumomab increased the risk of early failure at D28. The 18-month cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were 51%, 44%, and 74%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 15.5 months. Factors associated with a high tumor burden (occurrence of cytokine release syndrome) and prior blinatumomab were associated with an increased CIR, and a shorter EFS and OS. Pre-lymphodepletion high disease burden (MRD >= 10(-2), SHR 10.4, p = 0.03) and detectable MRD at D28 (SHR 7.2, p = 0.006) correlated with an increased risk of CD19(neg) relapse. Low disease burden (SHR 5.3, p = 0.03) and loss of B-cell aplasia (BCA) (SHR 21.7, p = 0.004) predicted an increased risk of CD19(pos) relapses. These data highlight the impact of prior therapy on patient outcome. Finally, detectable MRD at D28 and loss of BCA both define patients at high risk of relapse for whom additional interventions are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available