4.6 Article

Higher Ultrasonic Frequency Liquid Phase Exfoliation Leads to Larger and Monolayer to Few-Layer Flakes of 2D Layered Materials

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 37, Issue 15, Pages 4504-4514

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03668

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission [814413]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sonication-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation is a reliable method for preparing graphene and other 2D materials. Increasing sonication frequency can lead to the formation of monolayer or few-layered flakes, suitable for a wide range of applications.
Among the most reliable techniques for exfoliation of two-dimensional (2D) layered materials, sonication-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) is considered as a cost-effective and straightforward method for preparing graphene and its 2D inorganic counterparts at reasonable sizes and acceptable levels of defects. Although there were rapid advances in this field, the effect and outcome of the sonication frequency are poorly understood and often ignored, resulting in a low exfoliation efficiency. Here, we demonstrate that simple mild bath sonication at a higher frequency and low power positively contributes to the thickness, size, and quality of the final exfoliated products. We show that monolayer graphene flakes can be directly exfoliated from graphite using ethanol as a solvent by increasing the frequency of the bath sonication from 37 to 80 kHz. The statistical analysis shows that similar to 77% of the measured graphene flakes have a thickness below three layers with an average lateral size of 13 mu m. We demonstrate that this approach works for digenite (Cu9S5) and silver sulfide (Ag2S), thus indicating that this exfoliation technique can be applied to other inorganic 2D materials to obtain high-quality few-layered flakes. This simple and effective method facilitates the formation of monolayer/few layers of graphene and transition metal chalcogenides for a wide range of applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available