4.4 Article

Evaluation of environmental enrichment for Xenopus laevis using a preference test

Journal

LABORATORY ANIMALS
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 428-434

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00236772211011290

Keywords

Preference test; environmental enrichment; Xenopus laevis; husbandry; pipes; plants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Xenopus laevis frogs prefer artificial plants over PVC pipes and clear spaces as enrichment elements, which contributes to their adaptation and welfare. When raising X. laevis frogs, priority should be given to providing artificial plants. The use of plants is beneficial for observing frogs and reducing detritus accumulation.
Xenopus laevis frogs have long been widely used as an animal model in research. However, their husbandry has scarcely evolved, although they are prone to environmental stress. Environmental enrichment has been shown to improve animal welfare and adaptation, as well as zootechnical indices, which have become very important in recent years. The aim of this study was to examine the preferences of X. laevis frogs for various elements of environmental enrichment: opaque polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes, artificial plants and clear spaces. A preferential study was conducted in two different tanks, each divided into six parts, where the two enrichment elements were rotated. Ten X. laevis frogs were introduced into each tank, and the number of frogs was counted in each division three times per day for six weeks. The number of frogs in the different spaces and different enrichments was evaluated through a Poisson regression model. Frogs preferred plants to PVC pipes and clear spaces regardless of the position of the enrichment element, time and day. This indicates that artificial plants should be used as the enrichment element rather than the commonly used PVC pipes. In addition, the use of plants facilitates the observation of frogs without disturbing them and reduces the accumulation of detritus, as it occurs inside the pipes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available