Journal
LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages E147-E153Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmab027
Keywords
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; serology; antibody kinetics; performance evaluation; immunoassay
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the performance of 2 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays and found both tests to have acceptable performance. Although Seroconversion occurred earlier with the COV2T test, both tests showed a sensitivity approaching 100% after 14 days of symptom onset.
Objective: In this study, the performance of 2 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays is evaluated. Methods: The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total (COV2T) and IgG (COV2G) antibody tests were evaluated on a Siemens Atellica IM1300 analyzer. Imprecision was assessed with the CLSI EP15 protocol using positive controls. Ninety control group specimens were analyzed for specificity, and 175 specimens from 58 patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were measured for the sensitivity and kinetics of the antibbody response. Results: Within-run and total imprecision were acceptable for both assays. Both tests showed a specificity of 100%. Sensitivity earlier in the disease state was greater for the COV2T assay than for the COV2G assay, but sensitivity >14 days after onset of symptoms approached 100 degrees h for both. For all patients, antibody titers remained above the seroconversion cutoff for all follow-up specimens. Conclusion: This study shows acceptable performance for both the Siemens COV2T and COV2G test, although seroconversion occurs earlier with the COV2T test.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available