4.7 Editorial Material

Use of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: a multicenter observational study

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 2-5

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.017

Keywords

acute kidney injury; acute peritoneal dialysis; COVID-19; mortality; kidney replacement therapy

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [K23 DK114476]
  2. NIDDK [R18 DK118471-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated the feasibility of acute PD for acute kidney injury during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified male sex and mechanical ventilation on admission as significant predictors of mortality.
To demonstrate feasibility of acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) for acute kidney injury during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we performed a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of 94 patients who received acute PD in New York City in the spring of 2020. Patient comorbidities, severity of disease, laboratory values, kidney replacement therapy, and patient outcomes were recorded. The mean age was 61 +/- 11 years; 34% were women; 94% had confirmed COVID-19; 32% required mechanical ventilation on admission. Compared to the levels prior to initiation of kidney replacement therapy, the mean serum potassium level decreased from 5.1 +/- 0.9 to 4.5 +/- 0.7 mEq/L on PD day 3 and 4.2 +/- 0.6 mEq/L on day 7 (P < 0.001 for both); mean serum bicarbonate increased from 20 +/- 4 to 21 +/- 4 mEq/L on PD day 3 (P [ 0.002) and 24 +/- 4 mEq/L on day 7 (P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 30 days, 46% of patients died and 22% had renal recovery. Male sex and mechanical ventilation on admission were significant predictors of mortality. The rapid implementation of an acute PD program was feasible despite resource constraints and can be lifesaving during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available