Journal
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 2007-2013Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.15362
Keywords
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; immunoassay; platelet activation; thrombocytopenia; thrombosis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Commercially available assays in the UK showed poor sensitivity for detecting anti-PF4 antibodies in suspected VITT patients when compared to ELISA testing. No superiority of IgG-ELISAs over polyspecific ELISAs in sensitivity to VITT was demonstrated, and no single ELISA method detected all possible/probable VITT cases. If a single ELISA test is negative, a second ELISA or platelet activation assay should be considered for cases with strong clinical suspicion.
Introduction Vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) following ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccine has been described, associated with unusual site thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, raised D-dimer, and high-titer immunoglobulin-G (IgG) class anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have been shown to detect anti-PF4 in patients with VITT, but chemiluminescence assays do not reliably detect them. ELISA assays are not widely available in diagnostic laboratories, and, globally, very few laboratories perform platelet activation assays. Methods Assays that are commercially available in the United Kingdom were evaluated for their ability to identify anti-PF4 antibodies in samples from patients with suspected VITT. Four IgG-specific ELISAs, two polyspecific ELISAs, and four rapid assays were performed on samples from 43 patients with suspected VITT from across the United Kingdom. Cases were identified after referral to the UK Expert Haematology Panel multidisciplinary team and categorized into unlikely, possible, or probable VITT. Results and Discussion We demonstrated that the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG, HemosIL HIT-Ab, Diamed PaGIA gel, and STic Expert assays have poor sensitivity for VITT in comparison to ELISA. Where these assays are used for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) diagnosis, laboratories should ensure that requests for suspected VITT are clearly identified so that an ELISA is performed. No superiority of IgG-ELISAs over polyspecific ELISAs in sensitivity to VITT could be demonstrated. No single ELISA method detected all possible/probable VITT cases; if a single ELISA test is negative, a second ELISA or a platelet activation assay should be considered where there is strong clinical suspicion.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available