4.6 Article

Rovalpituzumab Tesirine as a Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage- SCLC: Results From the Phase 3 MERU Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1570-1581

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.03.012

Keywords

Rovalpituzumab tesirine; Small cell lung cancer; Maintenance; Phase 3; DLL3; Platinum-based chemotherapy

Funding

  1. AbbVie, Inc.
  2. AbbVie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the efficacy of Rova-T versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with extensive-stage-SCLC, but did not show a survival benefit in patients with DLL3-high tumors. Rova-T significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo by investigator assessment, but was associated with higher grade toxicities.
Introduction: Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand expressed in SCLC tumors. We evaluated the efficacy of Rova-T versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with extensive-stage-SCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: MERU was a phase 3 randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled study. Patients without disease progression after four cycles of platinum-based, front-line chemotherapy were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T or placebo (every 6 wk, omitted every third cycle). Primary efficacy end points were progression-free survival (PFS) evaluated by the Central Radiographic Assessment Committee and overall survival (OS) in patients with DLL3-high tumors. Results: Median age of all randomized patients (N = 748) was 64 years; 78% had TNM stage IV disease. At futility analysis of the subset with DLL3-high tumors, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.36) favoring the placebo arm, with median OS of 8.5 and 9.8 months in the Rova-T and placebo arms, respectively; futility criteria were met. Rova-T signifi-cantly improved PFS versus placebo by investigator assessment (4.0 versus 1.4 mo, hazard ratio = 0.48, p < 0.001). Any-grade adverse events (>20%) in the Rova-T arm were pleural effusion (27%), decreased appetite (27%), peripheral edema ( 26%), photosensitivity reaction (25%), fatigue ( 25%), nausea (22%), and dyspnea (21%). Conclusions: Because of the lack of survival benefit in the Rova-T arm, the study did not meet its primary end point and was terminated early. As a result, the Central Radiographic Assessment Committee evaluation of PFS was not performed. The frequency of grade greater than or equal to 3 and drug-related toxicities were higher with Rova-T versus placebo. Rova-T was associated with unique toxicities, such as pleural and pericardial effusions, photosensitivity reaction, and peripheral edema, which should be carefully considered in the population with extensive-stage- SCLC. (c) 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available