4.7 Article

Experimental research and CFD analysis on double pipe heat exchanger with CuO nano particle suspended in cold water

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages 3831-3838

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10804-4

Keywords

Double pipe heat exchanger; CuO nano particle; Heat transfer; CFD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that CuO nanoparticles significantly reduced the cold-water inlet temperature and increased the heat transfer rate. Simulation results confirmed that lower concentrations of CuO nanoparticles had less impact compared to higher concentrations. The proposed model can be applied to various heat exchanger designs.
In this paper, the heat transfer rate of CuO nanoparticle suspended cold-water flow in a double pipe heat exchanger is evaluated. The average size of CuO nanoparticles is 35 nm is dissolved in deionized water, flowing in the counter direction of a hot-water pipe. The velocity and the discharge rate were maintained constant and the dispersion rate of CuO nanoparticles was varied (0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mass%). The system inlet temperature (hot water) was 50 degrees C and the cold-water inlet temperature was found to vary with respect to the suspended particle proportion. The experimental results showed that the CuO nanoparticle has highly influenced to reduce the cold-water inlet temperature and heat transferred rate found to be drastically increased from 183 to 3488 kW. Subsequently, with appropriate input details and boundary conditions, the experimentation was simulated with valid computation fluid dynamics software. Simulated results confirmed that the lower concentration of CuO nanoparticle had less impact compared to that of higher concentration of suspended particles. It is found that the experimental results and simulated data found to be very similar, and hence it is confirmed that the proposed model can be executed for different heat exchanger designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available