4.5 Article

Selection of dual-core yarn production parameters for denim fabric by using MULTIMOORA method

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages 1039-1047

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1914411

Keywords

Denim; core-spun; dual-core; wool; elastane; MOORA method

Funding

  1. Research Center of the Erciyes University [FDK-2016-6700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed innovative dual-core yarn structures containing elastane and wool cores to produce denim fabrics with increased thermal insulation, by changing production parameters. The selection of the best yarn type for denim production was done using Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA), determining production parameters for optimal results.
Dual-core yarn structures, one of the hybrid yarn types preferred in denim fabric structures recently, make it possible to improve the stretch properties of fabrics and to profit from the features of two or more materials simultaneously. In this study, innovative dual-core yarn structures containing elastane and wool yarn cores and cotton fiber as sheath fibers were developed by changing production parameters (twist, cores draft ratio). It is thought that innovative, relatively more natural denim fabrics with increased thermal insulation can produce with dual-core yarns containing wool fiber. The yarn type that meets the expectations of denim manufacturers among the 27 yarn types was selected with Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) from multi-criteria decision-making methods, and production parameters were determined. According to the MULTIMOORA method and expert opinion, 16 coded dual-core yarn sample (670 T/m, 1.05 wool draft ratio, and 3.3 elastane draft ratio) was the best alternative, and eight coded dual-core yarn sample (585 T/m, 3.5 elastane draft ratio, and 1.05 wool draft ratio) was the worst alternative found for denim fabric production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available