4.5 Review

Approach to patient with unilateral optic disc edema and normal visual function

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 424, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117414

Keywords

Optic disc edema; Unilateral; Optic disc drusen; Papilledema

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For patients with swollen optic nerve head and normal visual function, optic disc drusen (ODD) should be the first consideration, followed by further investigations to rule out other possible causes. Patients with imaging signs of raised intracranial pressure should undergo lumbar puncture to assess for intracranial hypertension, with prompt ophthalmological consultation if necessary.
In patients with swollen optic nerve head and normal visual function, optic disc drusen (ODD) is the most common diagnosis. The best tests for detecting ODD are funds autofluorescence and enhanced-depth imaging ocular coherence tomography (EDIOCT). After ODD has been ruled out, asymmetric papilledema should be assumed to be the cause and MRI of the brain and orbits with contrast and venography should be performed in all patients. It allows one to look for indirect signs of increased inctracranial pressure (ICP), optic perineuritis, and other inflammatory or compressive processes affecting optic nerve or its sheath such as optic nerve sheath meningioma. If imaging signs of raised ICP are present, lumbar puncture should be performed with measurement of opening pressure and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) contents in all patients with fever, meningismus or neurologic deficits as well as patients who are not in the typical demographic group for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Optic nerve sheath enhancement on MRI should prompt work-up for causes of optic perineuritis. When the appropriate neuroimaging is normal, the differential diagnosis is limited and ophthalmological consultation is necessary to determine whether other subtle ocular abnormalities are present on biomicroscopic and dilated fundus examination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available