4.6 Article

Effect of thermocycling on the surface properties of resin-matrix CAD-CAM ceramics after different surface treatments

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104401

Keywords

Resin-matrix; CAD-CAM ceramics; Microhardness; Surface roughness; Water contact angle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the effect of thermocycling on resin-matrix CAD-CAM ceramics with different surface treatments, finding that thermocycling can affect the surface roughness, microhardness, and water contact angle of the ceramics. Significant differences were observed in these properties among different materials and surface treatment methods.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of thermocycling on the water contact angle (WCA), surface roughness (SR), and microhardness (MH) of resin-matrix computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) ceramics after different surface treatments (conventional polishing or 2 different surface sealants). Material and methods: Two different types of resin-matrix CAD-CAM ceramics; a nanoparticle-filled resin (CeraSmart; CS) and a resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate; LU) were tested. Rectangular-shaped plates (1 mmthick) were divided into 3 groups (n = 8) in terms of surface treatment methods applied: conventional polishing (control) or 2 surface sealants (Optiglaze (OG) and Palaseal (PS)). Scanning electron microscope images ( ? 1000 and ? 700 magnifications) of each material were taken from 2 additional specimens before surface treatments. After surface treatments, WCAs of deionized water, SR, and MH values of specimens were measured. All specimens were subjected to 5000 thermocycling and measurements were repeated. SR, WCA, and MH data before and after thermocycling were compared by using a 2-way ANOVA (?=.05). Results: A significant interaction was found between the surface treatment and the material for WCA after thermocycling (P < .001), for SR before thermocycling (P = .014), and for MH both before and after thermocycling (P .001). SEM images before surface treatments revealed that the surface of CS was mechanically rougher with a more microretentive topography compared with the surface of LU. No significant correlation was found between SR and WCA (P 0.05). Conclusions: Thermocycling affected the SR, MH, and WCA of all resin-matrix CAD-CAM ceramics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available