4.7 Article

Bulk high-entropy hexaborides

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 5775-5781

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.027

Keywords

High-entropy ceramics; Hexaboride; Reactive SPS; Hardness; Work function

Funding

  1. UC Irvine MRSEC, Center for Complex and Active Materials, under National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR2011967]
  2. ONR MURI program [N000141512863]
  3. National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation Program [CHE1338173]
  4. NSF [DMR2011967]
  5. UC Irvine Materials Research Institute (IMRI)
  6. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility [DESC0012704]
  7. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141512863] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A group of CaB6-typed cubic rare earth high-entropy hexaborides have been successfully fabricated into dense bulk pellets with high microhardness and Young's moduli. The material's work functions were significantly higher than LaB6, as determined by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy.
For the first time, a group of CaB6-typed cubic rare earth high-entropy hexaborides have been successfully fabricated into dense bulk pellets (>98.5 % in relative densities). The specimens are prepared from elemental precursors via in-situ metal-boron reactive spark plasma sintering. The sintered bulk pellets are determined to be single-phase without any detectable oxides or other secondary phases. The homogenous elemental distributions have been confirmed at both microscale and nanoscale. The Vickers microhardness are measured to be 16-18 GPa at a standard indentation load of 9.8 N. The nanoindentation hardness and Young's moduli have been measured to be 19-22 GPa and 190-250 GPa, respectively, by nanoindentation test using a maximum load of 500 mN. The material work functions are determined to be 3.7-4.0 eV by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy characterizations, which are significantly higher than that of LaB6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available