4.6 Article

Electrodeposition of Ru onto Ru and Au Seed Layers from Solutions of Ruthenium Nitrosyl Sulfate and Ruthenium Chloride

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 168, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abff68

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Semiconductor Research Corporation [2764.001, 2764.003]
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1740270, 1740228]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [AFOSR FA9550-18-1-0063, FA9550-19-1-0156]
  4. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1740228] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that Ru electrodeposited from nitrosyl sulfate solutions forms a porous layer of (0001)-oriented Ru crystallites, with an average film density lower than that of bulk Ru. Increasing the applied current density results in higher density of the Ru layer but lower current efficiency.
The electrodeposition of Ru was investigated from solutions of ruthenium(III) nitrosyl sulfate and ruthenium(III) chloride onto seed layers of epitaxial and polycrystalline Ru and epitaxial Au. Using both galvanostatic and potentiostatic deposition modes, metallic Ru was found to electrodeposit as a porous layer comprised of (0001) oriented Ru crystallites, the presence of which was discovered and confirmed by X-ray and scanning transmission and transmission electron microscope (S/TEM) analyses. This finding was independent of the Ru salt and seed layer used. Using X-ray reflectivity (XRR), the average film density rho(eff) of the porous electrodeposited Ru layer was measured as less than the density of bulk rho(Ru,bulk) (14.414 g cm(-3)). Increasing the magnitude of the applied current density from -100 mu A cm(-2) to -10 mA cm(-2) in solutions of Ru nitrosyl sulfate increased the rho(eff) from 7.4 g cm(-3) to 9.7 g cm(-2) while the current efficiency decreased from 9.4% to 4.3%. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available