4.6 Article

Single-index Thresholding in Quantile Regression

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 117, Issue 540, Pages 2222-2237

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1915319

Keywords

Heterogeneity; Mixed-bootstrap; Quantile process; Smoothed estimator; Subgroup; Threshold regression

Funding

  1. IR/D program from the US National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. NSF [DMS-1712760]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11671096, 11731011, 12071087]
  4. [KLATASDS200204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a more flexible single-index threshold model in the quantile regression setup, dividing the sample based on a linear combination of predictors, and proposes a new estimator. By smoothing the threshold, Gaussian approximation for statistical inference is enabled, allowing characterization of the limiting distribution of the quantile process.
Threshold regression models are useful for identifying subgroups with heterogeneous parameters. The conventional threshold regression models split the sample based on a single and observed threshold variable, which enforces the threshold point to be equal for all subgroups of the population. In this article, we consider a more flexible single-index threshold model in the quantile regression setup, in which the sample is split based on a linear combination of predictors. We propose a new estimator by smoothing the indicator function in thresholding, which enables Gaussian approximation for statistical inference and allows characterizing the limiting distribution when the quantile process is interested. We further construct a mixed-bootstrap inference method with faster computation and a procedure for testing the constancy of the threshold parameters across quantiles. Finally, we demonstrate the value of the proposed methods via simulation studies, as well as through the application to an executive compensation data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available