4.5 Review

Quantum Sieving for Separation of Hydrogen Isotopes Using MOFs

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue 27, Pages 4278-4289

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201600253

Keywords

Isotopes; Hydrogen; Deuterium; Isotope separation; Metal organic frameworks; Quantum sieving; Quantum chemical affinity sieving

Funding

  1. National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2016M1A7A1A02005285]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2016R1C1B1007364]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1C1B1007364, 2016M1A7A1A02005285] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen isotope mixtures can be separated either by confinement in small pores [i.e., kinetic quantum sieving (KQS)] or by strong adsorption sites [i.e., chemical affinity quantum sieving (CAQS)]. MOFs are excellent candidates for study of these quantum effects, due to their well-defined, tunable pore structures and the potential to introduce strong adsorption sites directly into the framework structure. In this microreview we summarize the recent status of hydrogen isotope separation using MOFs and future strategies relating to it. Furthermore, a state-of-the-art technique for the direct measurement of selectivity with regard to isotope mixtures is introduced. Experimental results relating to separation factors with different pore apertures in the case of KQS and the role of open metal sites in that of CAQS as a function of temperature and gas pressure are given. Furthermore, technologically relevant parameters such as feasible operating pressure and temperature are discussed with respect to possible applications in a temperature swing process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available