4.8 Article

Amplification of Dissymmetry Factors in π-Extended [7]- and [9]Helicenes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 143, Issue 12, Pages 4661-4667

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c13197

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Fund of Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [EOS 30489208]
  3. FLAG-ERA Grant OPERA by DFG [437130745]
  4. ANR-DFG NLE Grant GRANAO by DFG [431450789]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  6. Labex CHARMMMAT [ANR-19-CE07-0040]
  7. ANR [ANR-19-CE07-0040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, pi-Extended [7]helicene and pi-Extended [9]helicene were successfully synthesized with improved photophysical properties and high circularly polarized luminescence brightness. The research also revealed that a small variation in helical length can cause an increase in dissymmetry factors.
pi-Extended helicenes constitute an important class of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with intrinsic chirality. Herein, we report the syntheses of pi-extended [7]helicene 4 and pi-extended [9]helicene 6 through regioselective cyclodehydrogenation in high yields, where a prefusion strategy plays a key role in preventing undesirable aryl rearrangements. The unique helical structures are unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystal structure analysis. Compared to the parent pristine [7]helicene and [9]helicene, these novel pi-extended helicenes display significantly improved photophysical properties, with a quantum yield of 0.41 for 6. After optical resolution by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography, the chiroptical properties of enantiomers 4-P/M and 6-P/M are investigated, revealing that the small variation in helical length from [7] to [9] can cause an approximately 10-fold increase in the dissymmetry factors. The circularly polarized luminescence brightness of 6 reaches 12.6 M-1 cm(-1) as one of the highest among carbohelicenes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available