4.7 Article

In situ defect quantification and phase identification during ash sintering using Raman spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 104, Issue 8, Pages 3873-3882

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.17807

Keywords

cerium; cerium compounds; flash sintering; Raman spectroscopy; vanadium; vanadium compounds

Funding

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-17-1-0142]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1144245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flash sintering is established as a method to rapidly densify or induce phase transformation in materials through applying an electric field. In this study, in situ Raman spectroscopy was used to investigate defect complexes and phase transformations during flash sintering. The fast characterization demonstrated in this work can be combined with well-developed models to elucidate the densification mechanism during flash sintering.
Flash sintering has been established as a method to rapidly densify or induce phase transformation in materials by applying an electric field. Understanding rapid transformations is challenging in a laboratory setting, where phase and defect populations may change with sub-second time scales. In this work, we apply in situ Raman spectroscopy to investigate defect complexes and phase transformations during flash sintering. We demonstrate that the oxygen vacancy complexes in Ce0.85Gd0.15O1.925 and the evolving phases in a SrCO3 + V2O5 reaction can be probed with acquisition times sufficient to monitor stage II of flash sintering. We establish how thermal effects can be separated from effects of the electric field and determine the resolution of the defect concentration. The fast characterization we demonstrate here can be combined with well-developed models of thermal and phase evolution to elucidate the mechanism of densification during flash sintering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available