4.5 Article

Numerical study of the coupling layer between transducer and chip in acoustofluidic devicesa)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 149, Issue 5, Pages 3096-3105

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0004871

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Independent Research Fund Denmark, Technology and Production Sciences [8022-00285B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By numerical simulation, the impact of the coupling layer between the transducer and microfluidic chip on acoustic resonances in ultrasound acoustofluidic devices was studied. It was found that by controlling the thickness and material of the coupling layer, optimal and robust acoustofluidic resonances can be achieved. The study also established a simple criterion based on the phase of the acoustic wave to determine whether a given resonance is sustained or attenuated by the addition of the coupling layer.
By numerical simulation in two and three dimensions, the coupling layer between the transducer and microfluidic chip in ultrasound acoustofluidic devices is studied. The model includes the transducer with electrodes, microfluidic chip with a liquid-filled microchannel, and coupling layer between the transducer and chip. Two commonly used coupling materials, solid epoxy glue and viscous glycerol, as well as two commonly used device types, glass capillary tubes and silicon-glass chips, are considered. It is studied how acoustic resonances in ideal devices without a coupling layer are either sustained or attenuated as a coupling layer of increasing thickness is inserted. A simple criterion based on the phase of the acoustic wave for whether a given zero-layer resonance is sustained or attenuated by the addition of a coupling layer is established. Finally, by controlling the thickness and the material, it is shown that the coupling layer can be used as a design component for optimal and robust acoustofluidic resonances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available