4.5 Article

Characterization of an underwater metamaterial made of aluminum honeycomb panels at low frequencies

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 149, Issue 3, Pages 1829-1837

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0003629

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative grant from the Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0631]
  2. McKinney Fellowship in Acoustics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method for characterizing the effective properties of inertial acoustic metamaterial unit cells for underwater operation using numerical simulations and measurements. The method is validated by a metamaterial unit cell composed of aluminum honeycomb panels with soft rubber spacers, showing good agreement between simulated and measured responses. The sub-unity density ratio and anisotropic mass density achieved by the metamaterial unit cell make it useful for transformation acoustics, with potential applications in underwater acoustic devices.
This paper presents a method to characterize the effective properties of inertial acoustic metamaterial unit cells for underwater operation. The method is manifested by a fast and reliable parameter retrieval procedure utilizing both numerical simulations and measurements. The effectiveness of the method was proved to be self-consistent by a metamaterial unit cell composed of aluminum honeycomb panels with soft rubber spacers. Simulated results agree well with the measured responses of this metamaterial in a water-filled resonator tube. A sub-unity density ratio and an anisotropic mass density are simultaneously achieved by the metamaterial unit cell, making it useful in implementations of transformation acoustics. The metamaterial, together with the approach for its characterization, are expected to be useful for underwater acoustic devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available