4.5 Article

Noise of underwater explosions in the North Sea. A comparison of experimental data and model predictions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 149, Issue 3, Pages 1878-1888

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0003754

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Vattenfall

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sound measurements near two detonations of unexploded ordnance in the North Sea were analyzed to improve model predictions of the area affected by UXO detonations on harbour porpoises. The measurements validated the prediction model up to a distance of 12 km, and the results showed a strong dependence on sea sediment layering. The noise levels determined the permanent-threshold-shift effect distances for harbour porpoises, ranging from 2 to 6 km for the two detonations.
An analysis is presented of sound measurements performed near two detonations of unexploded ordnance (UXO) in the North Sea, at distances ranging from 1.5 to 12 km. The charge masses of the detonations were 325 and 140 kg TNT equivalent. The objective of the measurements was to improve the accuracy of model predictions of the area where UXO detonations affect harbour porpoises in the North Sea. For the predictions, an explosion emission model is combined with a shallow-water propagation model. The prediction model was previously validated for distances up to 2 km. The measurements reported here allowed validation up to a distance of 12 km. The measured levels and spectra are well explained by the model calculations. The model results depend strongly on the sea sediment layering. The propagation of high-frequency components appears to be affected primarily by the silty top layer, while low-frequency components are affected also by deeper sandy layers. Measured and calculated noise levels are used to determine permanent-threshold-shift effect distances for harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Values ranging from 2 to 6 km are found for the two detonations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available