4.5 Article

European starlings (sturnus vulgaris) discriminate rhythms by rate, not temporal patterns

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 149, Issue 4, Pages 2546-2558

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0004215

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starlings trained to discriminate between rhythmic patterns with or without a regular beat were unable to do so effectively. They relied on absolute temporal features to categorize sounds as fast or slow, demonstrating a focus on local features in rhythms rather than global temporal organization.
Humans can perceive a regular psychological pulse in music known as the beat. The evolutionary origins and neural mechanisms underlying this ability are hypothetically linked to imitative vocal learning, a rare trait found only in some species of mammals and birds. Beat perception has been demonstrated in vocal learning parrots but not in songbirds. We trained European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) on two sound discriminations to investigate their perception of the beat and temporal structure in rhythmic patterns. First, we trained birds on a two-choice discrimination between rhythmic patterns of tones that contain or lack a regular beat. Despite receiving extensive feedback, the starlings were unable to distinguish the first two patterns. Next, we probed the temporal cues that starlings use for discriminating rhythms in general. We trained birds to discriminate a baseline set of isochronous and triplet tone sequences. On occasional probe trials, we presented transformations of the baseline patterns. The starlings' responses to the probes suggest they relied on absolute temporal features to sort the sounds into fast and slow and otherwise ignored patterns that were present. Our results support that starlings attend to local features in rhythms and are less sensitive to the global temporal organization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available