4.6 Article

Solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation for (n+1) (2n+1)-vertex models using a differential approach

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/abf7be

Keywords

algebraic structures of integrable models; exact results; integrable spin chains and vertex models

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento-CNPq-Brasil [305856/2017-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formal derivatives of the Yang-Baxter equation with respect to its spectral parameters yield two systems of differential equations, which can be simplified into two systems of polynomial equations by eliminating the derivatives of the R matrix elements. The polynomial systems have a non-zero Hilbert dimension and allow for solving some unknowns through simple differential equations, ensuring the uniqueness and generality of the solutions.
The formal derivatives of the Yang-Baxter equation with respect to its spectral parameters, evaluated at some fixed point of these parameters, provide us with two systems of differential equations. The derivatives of the R matrix elements, however, can be regarded as independent variables and eliminated from the systems, after which, two systems of polynomial equations are obtained in their place. In general, these polynomial systems have a non-zero Hilbert dimension, which means that not all elements of the R matrix can be fixed through them. Nevertheless, the remaining unknowns can be found by solving a few simple differential equations that arise as consistency conditions of the method. The branches of the solutions can also be easily analyzed by this method, which ensures the uniqueness and generality of the solutions. In this work, we consider the Yang-Baxter equation for (n + 1) (2n + 1)-vertex models with a generalization based on the A ( n-1) symmetry. This differential approach allows us to solve the Yang-Baxter equation in a systematic way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available