4.5 Article

The generation of human innate lymphoid cells is influenced by the source of hematopoietic stem cells and by the use of G-CSF

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 1271-1278

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201546079

Keywords

G-CSF; HSCT; ILC; ILC development; NK cells; Plerixafor

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [10225, 15283]
  2. Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5x1000 [9962]
  3. Ministero dell'istruzione, universita e ricerca (Progetto di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale, PRIN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NK cells play a central role in the haploidentical HSC transplantation (HSCT) to cure high-risk leukemias. Other innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) have been proposed to exert a protective role in graft-versus-host disease and could also contribute to anti-microbial defence and to lymphoid tissue remodeling. Thus, we investigated the ILC differentiation potential of HSCs isolated from BM, mobilized peripheral blood (PB), and umbilical cord blood (UCB). BM CD34(+) cells are enriched in lymphoid-committed precursors, while PB CD34(+) cells preferentially contain myeloid precursors. In vitro differentiation experiments revealed that the highest and the lowest CD56(+) CD161(+) ILC recovery was detected in UCB and PB HSC cultures, respectively. Among CD56(+) CD161(+) ILCs, the ratio between NK cells and ILC3s was similar for all HSC analyzed. ILC recovery in PB CD34(+) cultures was lower for G-CSF-mobilized HSCs (good mobilizers) than for G-CSF+ plerixafor-mobilized HSC (poor mobilizers). Moreover, G-CSF inhibited in vitro ILC recovery and the degree of inhibition was proportional to the time of exposure to the cytokine. Thus, although all common sources of HSC for transplant differentiate towards ILCs, substantial differences exist among different sources and G-CSF may influence ILC recovery. These data offer new clues for a better understanding of the immune reconstitution after HSCT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available