4.5 Article

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: A modified Delphi study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110386

Keywords

Implementation science; Medically unexplained symptoms; Primary care

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [733025]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [733025] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explored key barriers and facilitators to the implementation of MUS interventions in primary care, finding that time constraints were major barriers while a positive attitude towards MUS patients was the most important facilitator. Results indicate some variations in different professions.
Objective: Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) are physical symptoms that last for longer than several weeks and for which no (sufficient) somatic explanation can be found. Interventions for treating MUS in primary care are available, but their implementation in daily practice appears difficult. In the current study we aim to explore key barriers and facilitators to the implementation of MUS-interventions in primary care. Methods: A three-round modified Delphi study was performed, using the input of 58 experts that are (in)directly involved in the care for patients with MUS (e.g. general practitioners (GPs), GP mental health workers, policy advisors). In the first online questionnaire, we generated ideas about relevant barriers and facilitators on different implementation levels. These ideas were independently coded by two researchers, and reformulated into unique barriers and facilitators. In round two, participants selected the ten most relevant barriers and facilitators from round one, which were ranked on importance in round three. Results: We identified 42 unique barriers and 57 unique facilitators to the implementation of MUS-interventions. The three highest ranked barriers were all related to time, i.e. too little time for treating complex MUS-patients. The most important facilitator was a positive attitude towards MUS-patients. Results varied somewhat per profession. Conclusion: Key barriers and facilitators to the implementation of MUS-interventions seem to exist on the level of the patient, intervention, professional, organization, and external context. All of these levels should be taken into account in order to increase implementation success of MUS-interventions in primary care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available