4.5 Article

TAP-mediated processing of exoerythrocytic antigens is essential for protection induced with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium sporozoites

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 885-896

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201545748

Keywords

Antigen presenting cells; CD8(+) T cells; Liver; Plasmodium; Transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP)

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [AI46438]
  2. US Army Materiel Command

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MHC class I dependent CD8(+) T cells are essential for protection induced by radiationattenuated Plasmodium sporozoites (RAS) inmurine malaria models. Apart from the mechanism of activation of CD8(+) T cells specific for the circumsporozoite protein, the major sporozoite antigen (Ag), CD8(+) T cells specific for other exoerythrocytic Ags that have been shown to mediate protection have not been thoroughly investigated. Specifically, mechanisms of processing and presentation of exoerythrocytic Ags, which includes liver stage (LS) Ags, remain poorly understood. We hypothesize that as exogenous proteins, LS Ags are processed by mechanisms involving either the TAP-dependent phagosomal-to- cytosol or TAP-independent vacuolar pathway of cross-presentation. We used TAP-deficient mice to investigate whether LS Ag mediated induction of naive CD8(+) T cells and their recall during sporozoite challenge occur by the TAP-dependent or TAP-independent pathways. On the basis of functional attributes, CD8(+) T cells were activated via the TAP-independent pathway during immunizations with Plasmodium berghei RAS; however, IFN-gamma(+) CD8(+) T cells previously induced by P. berghei RAS in TAP-deficient mice failed to be recalled against sporozoite challenge and the mice became parasitemic. On the basis of these observations, we propose that TAP-associated Ag processing is indispensable for sterile protection induced with P. berghei RAS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available