4.5 Article

Antigen-specific TIL therapy for melanoma: A flexible platform for personalized cancer immunotherapy

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1351-1360

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201545849

Keywords

Antigens; CD8(+) T cells; Enrichment; Melanoma; TIL therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF 2012-5463]
  2. Stand Up To Cancer-Cancer Research Institute Immunology Translational Cancer Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy has shown objective clinical response rates of 50% in stage IV melanoma patients in a number of clinical trials. Nevertheless, the majority of patients progress either directly upon therapy or after an initial period of tumor control. Recent data have shown that most TIL products that are used for therapy contain only low frequencies of T cells reactive against known melanoma-associated epitopes. Because of this, the development of a technology to create T-cell products that are enriched for reactivity against defined melanoma-associated antigens would seem valuable, both to evaluate the tumoricidal potential of T cells directed against different antigen classes and to potentially increase response rates. Here, we developed and validated a conditional MHC streptamer-based platform for the creation of TIL products with defined antigen reactivities. We have used this platform to successfully enrich both high-frequency (>= 1%) and low-frequency (<1%) tumor-specific CD8(+) T-cell populations, and thereby created T-cell products with enhanced tumor recognition potential. Collectively, these data demonstrate that selection of antigen-specific T-cell populations can be used to create defined T-cell products for clinical use. This strategy thus forms a highly flexible platform for the development of antigen-specific cell products for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available