4.5 Article

Quantum magnetotransport oscillations in graphene nanoribbons coupled to superconductors

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 33, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/abf8d1

Keywords

graphene nanoribbon; superconductor; Andreev reflection; magnetotransport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the oscillations in magnetic field regimes of zigzag and armchair graphene nanoribbons in contact with superconductors become irregular and/or suppressed as the coupling strength increases. These oscillations differ from those of a nonrelativistic two-dimensional electron gas and are attributed to the phase shift at the graphene-superconductor interface. Additionally, the presence of a magnetic field suppresses the quantum blocking of Andreev transmission in zigzag nanoribbons, regardless of the type of reflection involved.
Magnetotransport properties of zigzag and armchair graphene nanoribbons that are in contact with superconductors are investigated using a tight-binding model. The cyclotron orbital motion together with the quantum interference under the coexistence of Andreev and normal reflections gives rise to a number of oscillations in characteristic magnetic-field regimes when the superconducting coupling is weak. The oscillations become irregular and/or suppressed as the coupling is made strong. The period of the oscillations differs from that when a nonrelativistic two-dimensional electron gas is employed rather than the graphene sheet. The modifications of the oscillations are attributed to the phase shift associated with the reflection from the graphene-superconductor interface. The presence of a magnetic field suppresses the quantum blocking of Andreev transmission, which occurs for the edge mode of zigzag nanoribbons, in the same way regardless of it being induced by the Andreev retro- or specular reflection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available