4.6 Article

Near ambient pressure XPS investigation of hydrous palladium oxide under water and oxygen gas environments

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 54, Issue 32, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac0183

Keywords

ambient pressure XPS; palladium; hydrous oxide; hydroxide; water

Funding

  1. Korea Basic Science Institute [C030140, C180320]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [C030140, C180320] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that hydrous Pd oxide shows different spectral features than anhydrous Pd oxide under gaseous water environments, providing new information for better identification of hydrous Pd oxide under reaction conditions that is not available from conventional XPS in ultrahigh vacuum.
Pd takes various chemical forms according to the types of catalysts and even its pristine chemical state is often subject to change in operation. To understand the mechanism how Pd-based catalysts activate reactions, it is important to have a capability to identify the surface chemical state of Pd-based catalysts in contact with reactants. In this study, we conducted in situ near ambient pressure-x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (NAP-XPS) in gas conditions with water and oxygen for hydrous Pd oxide, which is also known as palladium hydroxide (Pd(OH)(2)) and it is the key component of the Pearlman's catalyst widely used for organic reactions. We found that hydrous Pd oxide showed different spectral features to that of anhydrous Pd oxide under gaseous water environments. We believe that this NAP-XPS study provides new information for a better identification of hydrous Pd oxide under reaction conditions, which is not available from conventional XPS in ultrahigh vacuum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available