4.6 Article

Heating ability modulation by clustering of magnetic particles for precision therapy and diagnosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 54, Issue 31, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac000b

Keywords

magnetic nanoparticles; clustering; magnetic hyperthermia; magnetic particle imaging; dipole-dipole interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the magnetic and thermal properties of clustered magnetite nanoparticles in a high-frequency magnetic field using rate equations. It finds that particle clustering significantly modifies the shape of hysteresis loops and affects the power released as heat to a host medium. Clustering of particles can either enhance or reduce the released power, with opposite effects observed depending on the dimensions of the clusters.
Magnetic and thermal properties of clustered magnetite nanoparticles submitted to a high-frequency magnetic field is studied by means of rate equations. A simple model of large particle clusters (containing more than one hundred individual particles) is introduced. Dipolar interactions among clustered particles markedly modify shape and area of the hysteresis loops in a way critically dependent on particle size and cluster dimensions, thereby modulating the power released as heat to a host medium. For monodisperse and polydisperse systems, particle clustering can lead to either a significant enhancement or a definite reduction of the released power; in particular cases the same particles can produce opposite effects in dependence of the dimensions of the clusters. Modulation by clustering of the heating ability of magnetic nanoparticles has impact on applications requiring optimization and accurate control of temperature in the host medium, such as magnetic hyperthermia for precision therapy or fluid flow management, and advanced diagnostics involving magnetic tracers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available