4.8 Article

Disentangling Nano- and Macroscopic Viscosities of Aqueous Polymer Solutions Using a Fluorescent Molecular Rotor

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 3182-3186

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Top Institute Food and Nutrition (TiFN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between fluorescence intensity and macroscopic viscosity can be described by the classical Forster-Hoffmann equation, with the value of the FH exponent depending on the polymer chain length. By plotting fluorescence against polymer concentration, all data can be collapsed onto a master curve, explaining the phenomenon in terms of the characteristic mesh size of the polymer solution. Known scaling laws for polymers can quantitatively explain the relation between the FH exponent and polymer chain length, linking nano- to macroviscosity.
The macroscopic viscosity of polymer solutions in general differs strongly from the viscosity at the nanometer scale, and the relation between the two can be complicated. To investigate this relation, we use a fluorescent molecular rotor that probes the local viscosity of its molecular environment. For a range of chain lengths and concentrations, the dependence of the fluorescence on the macroscopic viscosity is well described by the classical Forster-Hoffmann (FH) equation, but the value of the FH exponent depends on the polymer chain length. We show that all data can be collapsed onto a master curve by plotting the fluorescence versus polymer concentration, which we explain in terms of the characteristic mesh size of the polymer solution. Using known scaling laws for polymers then allows us to quantitatively explain the relation between the FH exponent and the polymer chain length, allowing us to link the nano- to the macroviscosity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available