4.8 Article

Insights from In Situ Studies on the Early Stages of Platinum Nanoparticle Formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 3224-3231

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00241

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Villum Foundation [VKR00015416]
  2. Carlsberg Foundation [CF14-0652, CF17-0976]
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [OE610/1-1, FOR2213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the formation mechanism of platinum nanoparticles synthesized without surfactants using various in situ characterization techniques. The formation of polynuclear structures with Pt-Pt coordination before the generation of nanoparticles is suggested to contribute to the observed fast nucleation during the synthesis process.
Understanding the formation of nanomaterials down to the atomic level is key to rational design of advanced materials. Despite their widespread use and intensive study over the years, the detailed formation mechanism of platinum (Pt) nanoparticles remains challenging to explore and rationalize. Here, various in situ characterization techniques, and in particular X-ray total scattering with pair distribution function (PDF) analysis, are used to follow the structural and chemical changes taking place during a surfactant-free synthesis of Pt nanoparticles in alkaline methanol. Polynuclear structures form at the beginning of the synthesis, and Pt-Pt pair distances are identified before any nanoparticles are generated. The structural motifs best describing the species formed change with time, e.g., from [PtCl5-PtCl5] and [PtCl6-Pt2Cl6-PtCl6] to [Pt2Cl10-Pt3Cl8-Pt2Cl10]. The formation of these polynuclear structures with Pt-Pt coordination before the formation of the nanoparticles is suggested to account for the fast nucleation observed in the synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available