4.4 Article

Intercostal cryoablation during Nuss procedure: A large volume single surgeon's experience and outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 56, Issue 12, Pages 2229-2234

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.006

Keywords

Nuss; Pectus excavatum; Intercostal cryoablation; Opioid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intercostal cryoablation during the Nuss procedure reduces hospital length of stay and opioid use, but increases the odds of slipped bars requiring reoperation.
Background: Recent studies have shown intercostal cryoablation(IC) during the Nuss procedure decreases hospital length of stay(LOS) and opioid administration. However, few studies have also evaluated the risk of postoperative complications related to IC. Methods: We performed a single center retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent Nuss procedure by one surgeon from 2/2016 to 2/2020, comparing intraoperative IC to other pain management modalities(non-IC). Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, hospital LOS, and opioid administration. Multivariate analysis was performed with outcomes reported as regression coefficients(RC) or odds ratios(OR) with 95% confidence interval. Results: IC was associated with decreased hospital LOS (RC -1.91[-2.29 to -1.54], less hospital opioid administration (RC -4.28[-5.13 to -3.43]), and less discharge opioid administration (RC -3.82[-5.23 to -2.41]). With respect to postoperative complications, IC decreased the odds of urinary retention (OR 0.16[0.06 to 0.44]); however, increased the odds of slipped bars requiring reoperation (OR 36.65[5.04-266.39]). Conclusions: Our single surgeon experience controls for surgeon variability and demonstrates intraoperative IC for the Nuss procedure is an effective pain management modality that decreases hospital LOS and opioid use during hospitalization and at discharge; however, it is associated with increased odds of slipped bars requiring reoperation. Level of evidence: III (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available