4.0 Article

Evaluation of Risk Factors Causing Ototoxicity in Childhood Cancers Located in the Head and Neck Region Treated With Platinum-based Chemotherapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages E930-E934

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002158

Keywords

ototoxicity; cisplatin; chemotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that children between 5 and 12 years old, cranial irradiation and simultaneous treatment with cisplatin and carboplatin were associated with ototoxicity. These factors were identified as significant risk factors for ototoxicity in multivariate analysis.
The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors contributing to the development of ototoxicity in children who received platinum-based chemotherapy for malignancies located in the head and neck region. Eighty-four children who received platinum-based chemotherapy were included. Audiologic evaluations were performed before and after each chemotherapy session through pure tone audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brainstem response tests. Ototoxicity was evaluated using Brock, Muenster, and Chang classifications. Factors such as cranial irradiation, cumulative doses of cisplatin, age, sex, cotreatment with aminoglycosides, schedule of platinum, and type of chemotherapeutic agent were analyzed. Using chi(2) tests, all risk factors were matched with the 3 ototoxicity classifications, and multivariate analyses were conducted using statistically significant risk factors. In univariate analyses, being between 5 and 12 years of age, cranial irradiation and being treated with both cisplatin and carboplatin were found to be related to ototoxicity in all 3 classifications. Logistic regression modeling analyses with these 3 risk factors showed that being between 5 and 12 years of age and being treated with both cisplatin and carboplatin significantly increased the risk of ototoxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available